<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>ابو مريم (npub17v…8cc5z)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17veg2gt7ja4dnjhs23jyttvpqlde3ajevlxuumxwghnqmgqwuv4q78cc5z</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>evidence for taraweeh (and many other sunnan) are really just interpretation which again comes down to a logical framework. and no, if you&#39;ve read any of my religious posts this year you know i don&#39;t buy the sahabah are the best alqeeda. &#xA;and i&#39;m not disagreeing with you on asharis (though Ghazali did pen a silly fatwa calling Aristotelian philosophers kafr which is ironically kinda the root of the poison in this discussion), i might disagree with them personally as well but i don&#39;t think they are entirely wrong in their logic either and i know they don&#39;t believe or intend to be going against the Quran. &#xA;&#xA;personally i came to islam via philosophy. reading the Quran many months later was only a confirmation of what i had already rationally understood from first principles. and i think it is important to recognize that this is how islam historically has spread. dawah in particular must come from a place of being able to have a dialogue with other religions and the foundation for this has been the greek philosophical tradition. otherwise you are stuck in polemic debates which aid no one but your nafs. &#xA;</html></oembed>