rich1.0npub18xqykhf26udeq2nyk98ee0a5q4w3s2f75m405a6zswpdy573lxeqmhg6zkhttps://nostr.ae/npub18xqykhf26udeq2nyk98ee0a5q4w3s2f75m405a6zswpdy573lxeqmhg6zknjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-08-30 📝 Original message:> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote: >> It would be nice if the issues and git repo for Bitcoin Core were not >> on such a centralized service as github, nice and convenient as it is. > > Despite my complaining about github, I don't like the idea of moving > somewhere else. The current way of working - to use github for storing > the tree, and use a custom script for signing+merging - is fine with > me. > > Github has a low barrier to contribution. Almost every open source > developer already has a github account. Switching to something > self-hosted makes it more difficult for people to contribute. > > Plus if we have to take the hosting upon ourselves, we have to handle > sysadmin work ourselves as well. That's not a good use of the limited > manpower available. > > Also it will be a lot of work to migrate over all the current issues > and pulls. I don't look forward to that. I don't see the point of > this, sorry. > > Wladimir > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > I agree with Wladimir, keep it simple. There being many other more urgent questions to address, imho.