<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2022-06-12&#xA;📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:02:18AM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt; Maintaining the security of the protocol is squarely the responsibility of&#xA;&gt; the Bitcoin software and the core developers&#xA;&gt; &#xA;&gt; Continued demand for block space is critical for Bitcoin&#39;s security.&#xA;&#xA;Only because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue&#xA;indefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block space&#xA;would not be critical to Bitcoin&#39;s security.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;https://petertodd.org &#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@petertodd.org&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 488 bytes&#xA;Desc: not available&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220611/af80f0d7/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>