<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-06-18&#xA;📝 Original message:On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Matt Corallo &lt;bitcoin-list at bluematt.me&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; Ive been trying to stay out of these increasingly useless shit-throwing contests, but I wanted to take objection to this... I highly, highly doubt any seriously technical person is making any kind of decision on block size issues based on their own personal network. If you&#39;re assuming this is a serious motivating factor for anyone, then I&#39;m not sure you&#39;ve even been reading your email or listening to the conversations you&#39;ve had with people over the last year or more.&#xA;&#xA;It&#39;s probably due to me: When I point to trends and broadband&#xA;_distribution_ in the US (much less the less developed parts of the&#xA;world), I&#39;m being &#34;hypothetical&#34;, and when I point to my _own_&#xA;connectivity as a concrete example it&#39;s &#34;personal&#34;. It&#39;s no joke that&#xA;communication is _hard_ but it&#39;s a shared responsibility however, and&#xA;no need to assume anyone isn&#39;t reading.,</html></oembed>