<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1xz8q68hmzur6c6uje593nscy3q4njx05h4vnxmz2wxxptx7u7casl2925u</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1xz8q68hmzur6c6uje593nscy3q4njx05h4vnxmz2wxxptx7u7casl2925u</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2012-11-27&#xA;📝 Original message:&gt;&#xA;&gt; We are not establishing an IETF working group, which is an option that&#xA;&gt; was explored prior to the Paris meeting and has been sidelined at&#xA;&gt; present for depth-of-bureaucracy by the backing commercial entities.&#xA;&gt; Rather, we are establishing a top-level IANA registry group. This is&#xA;&gt; not anticipated by the IETF old-guard working with us to be either (a)&#xA;&gt; controversial or (b) possible to block.&#xA;&#xA;My last note in this sub-thread.&#xA;&#xA;There are no IANA registry groups, there is no such thing, and no way&#xA;to form one. The IETF can ask the IANA to form a registry but these&#xA;things take lots of support and take a long time, and these are only&#xA;created through standards track RFC. ICANN runs the IANA and there is&#xA;no such framework that you elude to. Review&#xA;http://www.iana.org/protocols/&#xA;&#xA;If you are applying for a gTLD, good luck with that.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;-rick</html></oembed>