rich1.0npub1sm6zhjmk5scuz294jmpkw99wwwjzetjgwp4fu4gn6utqgdz87hkqamnq7hhttps://nostr.ae/npub1sm6zhjmk5scuz294jmpkw99wwwjzetjgwp4fu4gn6utqgdz87hkqamnq7hnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2012-05-02 📝 Original message:I think it's perfectly reasonable to debate ordering. I personally don't think Armory should be up front, because it's not intended for beginners. How's that for honesty? I don't think anyone is trying to game the system right now, I think we're trying to come up with a reasonable mechanism for appealing to new users and get the community more connected. And make sure everyone understands the system. On the other hand, perhaps it's better to take the acceptable 80% solution, and revise it over time... Amir, I don't have access to the page. I've never been able to view it. Changing my hosts file doesn't seem to do anything. Can you just forward me the text? I'll send you an approval email. On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com> wrote: > This discussion about ordering is absolutely retarded. Once the list fills > up, then it won't matter. For now I'm deciding the ordering with Bitcoin-Qt > first and the others ordered however. That was nobody can try to game the > system (it remains unexploitable). > > If there are no objections, then I am going to merge this branch. The > forum thread is divulging into a mess all over the place, and this > conversation can go on forever discussing the silly fine details: > > http://hackerspaces.org/wiki/The_Bikeshed_Anti-PatternProblem: > You suggest creating something new for your hackerspace, like a > bikeshed. But now all anyone will discuss is its colour. No bikeshed > will be built. > > Armory & MultiBit, are you OK with that description? I will check with > ThomasV about Electrum. > > > ________________________________ > From: Gary Rowe <g.rowe at froot.co.uk> > To: "bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net" < > bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net> > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 8:34 PM > Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page > > > How about keeping it simple? > > Bitcoin-Qt > * Requires the entire blockchain > * Standalone client > * Designed for continuous operation > * Available for Windows, Mac, Linux with installer > * Developed in C > * Website: https://bitcoin.org > > MultiBit > * Requires a reduced blockchain > * Standalone client > * Designed for occasional use > * Available for Windows, Mac, Linux with installer > * Developed in Java > * Website: http://multibit.org > > Armory > * Requires the entire blockchain > * Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt > * Designed for occasional use > * Available for Windows (64-bit only), Mac, Linux (self-build) > * Developed in Python > * Website: http://bitcoinarmory.com/ > > Electrum > * Requires no blockchain > * Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt (on server) > * Designed for occasional use > * Available for Windows, Linux (self-build) > * Developed in Python > * Website: http://ecdsa.org/electrum/ > > Bitcoin Wallet (Android client) > * Requires a reduced blockchain > * Standalone client > * Designed for occasional use on mobile > * Available for Android only > * Developed in Java > * Website: > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.wallet&hl=en > > > On 2 May 2012 20:25, Amir Taaki <zgenjix at yahoo.com> wrote: > > This is like the most annoying thing about email. Often with group emails, > we'll be having a conversation then someone will click reply instead of > group reply and the convo will go on for a while. Eventually I'll realise > the persons are missing and add them back in. > > > >On Yahoo mail (which I use for spam/mailing lists), to do reply all > involves clicking a tab, scrolling down and clicking Reply All. Normally I > instead go through the steps of reply, delete To, re-enter bitco... select > drop down, click send. > > > >Anyone know how to make reply all the default in mutt? And how can I > exclude it from re-including my own email when I do a group reply so I > don't get the same email again. > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at exmulti.com> > >To: grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> > >Cc: bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > >Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM > >Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page > > > > > >On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Try "Reply to All" > >> > >> That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc', > >> which dupes to the sender and eventually > >> blows out the to and cc lines as everyone > >> chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply to' solves > >> most of that. assuming the list sw can do it. > > > >"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful > >http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > > > > > > >-- > >Jeff Garzik > >exMULTI, Inc. > >jgarzik at exmulti.com > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Live Security Virtual Conference > >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >_______________________________________________ > >Bitcoin-development mailing list > >Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Live Security Virtual Conference > >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >_______________________________________________ > >Bitcoin-development mailing list > >Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20120502/08c0ebe1/attachment.html>