<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub10z4xjfgftd3fm9dfu7dw6mkemgyhxgumcmhd7yd0ggjq7rsaw4wqa3xfzw</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub10z4xjfgftd3fm9dfu7dw6mkemgyhxgumcmhd7yd0ggjq7rsaw4wqa3xfzw</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-02-12&#xA;📝 Original message:I apologize if this has been discussed many times before.&#xA;&#xA;As a long term solution to malleable transactions, wouldn&#39;t it be possible&#xA;to modify the signatures to be of the entire transaction.  Why do you have&#xA;to zero out the inputs?  I can see that this would be a hard fork, and&#xA;maybe it would be somewhat tricky to extract signatures first (since you&#xA;can sign everything except the signatures), but it would seem to me that&#xA;this is an important enough change to consider making.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Luke-Jr &lt;luke at dashjr.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 8:27:52 PM Mark Friedenbach wrote:&#xA;&gt; &gt; On 02/12/2014 08:44 AM, Alan Reiner wrote:&#xA;&gt; &gt; &gt; Changing the protocol to use these static IDs is a pretty fundamental&#xA;&gt; &gt; &gt; change that would never happen in Bitcoin.   But they can still be&#xA;&gt; &gt; &gt; useful at the application level to mitigate these issues.&#xA;&gt; &gt;&#xA;&gt; &gt; Not to mention that it would be potentially very insecure to have&#xA;&gt; &gt; consensus depend on data (scriptSigs) which are not hashed in the Merkle&#xA;&gt; &gt; structure of a block.&#xA;&gt; &gt;&#xA;&gt; &gt; Not that anyone on this list has suggested such a change, but I&#39;ve seen&#xA;&gt; &gt; it raised multiple times on the forum....&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; This would be a problem if it was used in the merkle tree, but I&#39;m pretty&#xA;&gt; sure&#xA;&gt; using it for input selection would be pretty safe. One could even avoid the&#xA;&gt; index by simply using the hashScript as the sole input value; then even&#xA;&gt; CoinJoins would be safe without breaking chains of transactions (although&#xA;&gt; this&#xA;&gt; would break address reuse entirely - but I don&#39;t see that as a problem in a&#xA;&gt; theoretical world). One of those things that an altcoin could improve upon&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin with... ;)&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;&gt; Android apps run on BlackBerry 10&#xA;&gt; Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps.&#xA;&gt; Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more.&#xA;&gt; Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience.  Start now.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&amp;iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk&#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;&gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&#xA;&gt;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140212/1bd41008/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>