<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1ccegg9n9lnx6huppxg43m95488yur7pfemkn3pz0agjws5ffvtts0ex8m8</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1ccegg9n9lnx6huppxg43m95488yur7pfemkn3pz0agjws5ffvtts0ex8m8</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-04-21&#xA;📝 Original message:Thomas V: &#xA;&#xA;Your proposal misses the points that:&#xA;&#xA;- this is about a unit with 1e-6 Bitcoins or 100 satoshis. &#xA;- it is not about people who know Bitcoin and are techies, but about those who don’t and aren’t.&#xA;&#xA;The reasons for such a unit are more than shifting the comma some places for convinience, &#xA;but to align Bitcoin with capabilities of existing financial software and customs of finance and average people,&#xA;and ISO standard of currency abbreviations.&#xA;&#xA;bit and XBT seems to check the boxes. &#xA;&#xA;I would love to have some feedback on xbit as per my previous mail.&#xA;&#xA;Regards,&#xA;&#xA;Tamas Blummer&#xA;http://bitsofproof.com&#xA;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140421/2b053b14/attachment.html&gt;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 495 bytes&#xA;Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140421/2b053b14/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>