<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15&#xA;📝 Original message:On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ben Davenport &lt;bendavenport at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; But may I suggest we consider changing the name &#34;stealth address&#34; to&#xA;&gt; something more neutral?&#xA;&#xA;ACK.  Regardless of the &#39;political&#39; overtones, I think stealth is a&#xA;little cringe-worthy.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;Private address&#34; would be fine if not for confusion with private-keys.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;Static address&#34; is perhaps the best in my view. (also helps improve&#xA;awareness that normal addresses are intended to be more one-use-ness)</html></oembed>