<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-06-14&#xA;📝 Original message:On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Eric Lombrozo &lt;elombrozo at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; 2) BIP100 has direct economic consequences…and particularly for miners. It&#xA;&gt; lends itself to much greater corruptibility.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;What is the alternative?  Have a Chief Scientist or Technical Advisory&#xA;Board choose what is a proper fee, what is a proper level of&#xA;decentralization, a proper growth factor?&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;Jeff Garzik&#xA;Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist&#xA;BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150614/82643684/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>