<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2017-09-27&#xA;📝 Original message:On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 01:35:33PM -0600, Chris Priest wrote:&#xA;&gt; A better solution is to just have the sending wallet check to see if the&#xA;&gt; address you are about to send to has been used before. If it&#39;s a fresh&#xA;&#xA;My concern is not primarily people re-using addresses, but rather people using&#xA;stale addresses that the recipient would rather not be used anymore. This&#xA;situation often happens even if the stale address has never been used.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;https://petertodd.org &#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@petertodd.org&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 455 bytes&#xA;Desc: Digital signature&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170927/33226c50/attachment-0001.sig&gt;</html></oembed>