rich1.0npub1mju50kqcm07heu967fkq6h4kq666xgekc4yrldf7q52xx9vr8jnsrdxnq7https://nostr.ae/npub1mju50kqcm07heu967fkq6h4kq666xgekc4yrldf7q52xx9vr8jnsrdxnq7njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2017-03-28 📝 Original message:On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 21:56:49 CEST Paul Iverson via bitcoin-dev wrote: > It is clear that, spam aside, blocks are getting full and we need increase > them soon. What I don't like about your proposal is it forces all node > operators to implicitly accept larger blocks in 2020, even maybe against > their will. 32 MB blocks might result in a loss of decentralization, and > it might be too difficult to coordinate for small blocks before it's too > late. The suggestion was not to produce 32MB blocks, so your fear here is unfounded. -- Tom Zander Blog: https://zander.github.io Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel