<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Galois (npub1rc…fct0w)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1rcmnvhhnrylm805ynwcnnte8uq8aen6nu7d2e33gwdrqy7fhzgkqwfct0w</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>nostr:npub1pm5z0gmw3wcvl3yreuv8y7q3stz2zmzc4jar4ckhk927qdcwjwuq3txe07 if people pay IN BTC for the tokens it’s a financial activity in the sense of Bitcoin. End. &#xA;You can’t justify it’s a spam anymore because it makes no sense. It moves utxos and complex transactions for Market PSBTs. So it’s fully Bitcoin financial txs. &#xA;&#xA;Now, in the simple brc-20 syntax indeed Bitcoin doesn’t verify but in the case of Wrapping Bitcoin into Brc-20 through W_PROTOCOL here brc-20 are generated ONLY if Bitcoin tx is valide and script locking address is well computed. &#xA;So it’s fully Bitcoin enforcement for token generation. The only remaining point is to be a network BUT as the protocol is clear and anyone can run it you only have to compare. If someone cheat you move on another and it’s finished for him. &#xA;&#xA;So it’s not censorable as long Bitcoin is not censorable </html></oembed>