<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7ed</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7ed</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-08-17&#xA;📝 Original message:For the record I would like to share my technical analysis of the Satoshi&#xA;email which I wrote in a pastebin (http://pastebin.com/Ct5M8fa2) a few days&#xA;ago.&#xA;&#xA;1. The email is the one used by Satoshi to announce Bitcoin in the first&#xA;place.&#xA;http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-October/014810.html&#xA;&#xA;2. The email was not spoofed, it actually originated from vistomail&#39;s&#xA;server. The email headers show the email originated from 190.97.163.93 and&#xA;the SPF records show this as an authorised sender for the email. This does&#xA;not prove the account wasn&#39;t hacked of course, or that the account might&#xA;have expired and be re-registered by someone else (vistomail is a paid for&#xA;email provider).&#xA;&#xA;3. While the email is not signed, and there are a number of PGP keys listed&#xA;on key servers for him (to vary addresses), he didnt sign any emails with&#xA;any PGP keys.&#xA;&#xA;It is therefore not possible to outright dismiss the email&#39;s authenticity&#xA;as the email originates from an authentic source. The only questions is&#xA;whether the webmail service was hacked or commandeered somehow.&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150817/14bc2afd/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>