<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2017-09-27&#xA;📝 Original message:On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:03:44PM -0700, Mark Friedenbach wrote:&#xA;&gt; While there is a lot that I would like to comment on, for the moment I will just mention that you should consider using the 17 bit relative time format used in CSV as an offset from the birthdate of the address, a field all addresses should also have.&#xA;&#xA;Why should addresses have a birthdate? I don&#39;t see why that information would&#xA;be relevant to the person sending funds, and it could pose a privacy risk.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;https://petertodd.org &#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@petertodd.org&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;A non-text attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;Name: signature.asc&#xA;Type: application/pgp-signature&#xA;Size: 455 bytes&#xA;Desc: Digital signature&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170927/b77a85ef/attachment.sig&gt;</html></oembed>