<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxc</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-01-16&#xA;📝 Original message:On 16 January 2014 00:05, Jeremy Spilman &lt;jeremy at taplink.co&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt;  Might I propose &#34;reusable address&#34;.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so&#xA;&gt; encourages wallets to present options as &#39;one time use&#39; vs &#39;reusable&#39;.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;The problem is all addresses are reusable and to an average user, addresses&#xA;are already reusable so there is little to distinguish the address format.&#xA;It might be better to call it a &#34;public address&#34; in common terminology.&#xA;&#xA;Drak&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140116/1b92b504/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>