rich1.0npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxchttps://nostr.ae/npub12rkw0jajmsck4uwdtksdvtswrlkypusfryjzera7m4fhqta6jhdsz3aqxcnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08 📝 Original message:On 8 December 2013 20:40, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote: > > Right now I think Sirius still owns DNS for bitcoin.org which is > nonsense. > > He needs to pass it on to someone who is actually still involved with the > > project. Again, the most obvious neutral candidate would be the > Foundation. > > I am opposed to Bitcoin Foundation having control of Bitcoin.org, and > I think it would be foolish of the foundation to accept it were it > offered. > What do you suggest though? We will need to trust someone (even in a group each person can act autonomously). The only thing I can suggest would be to hand the keys to the bitcoin project lead. Otherwise, who has admin rights to the code projects (github/sourceforge/this mailing list)? Those people have proven they can be trusted so far. Drak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131208/7513277a/attachment.html>