rich1.0npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58https://nostr.ae/npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-03-11 📝 Original message:Sure, but I don't see wallets being able to _assume_ _remote_ parties have an HD wallet for a long, long time. Interoperability common sense implies the environment will be heterogenous, perhaps forever, invalidating assume-each-party-uses-HD logic. On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Drak <drak at zikula.org> wrote: >> > I very much like the idea of assuming each party uses HD wallets, that >> > certainly simplifies things greatly. >> >> It also assumes a reality different from our current one. > > > Multisig wallets are a different reality from our current one, so when we > move to that new reality we should do it correctly from the beginning. > > -- > -- > Gavin Andrese -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/