rich1.0npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95jhttps://nostr.ae/npub1trckpcxmceskq4cykxgwxm63n8ugrjrpu5mk83c90e4upsf7d9gqf0f95jnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2014-01-15 📝 Original message:How about just calling them 'type S addresses'? Not sure any other name will in reality convey much more meaning than that. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:07:28PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > "Routing address" is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and > familiarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or > not... > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami <roy at gnomon.org.uk> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended > >> use/direction. > > > > ...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP? > > > > More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from > > the phrase "static address". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter > > than "address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated". :-) > > > > -roy > > > > -- > Jeff Garzik > Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist > BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ >