<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwet</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2017-09-27&#xA;📝 Original message:On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev&#xA;&lt;bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; A better solution is to just have the sending wallet check to see if the&#xA;&gt; address you are about to send to has been used before.&#xA;&#xA;So every wallet needs all the addresses ever used and a fast index into them?&#xA;This seems pretty harmful for scalability.&#xA;&#xA;&gt; they first consult the address expiration service,&#xA;&#xA;So you propose a best practice that requires contacting a service and&#xA;telling them what addresses you&#39;re planning on paying?  This seems&#xA;pretty harmful for privacy.</html></oembed>