rich1.0npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpghttps://nostr.ae/npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpgnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-02-14 📝 Original message:On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Adam Back <adam at cypherspace.org> wrote: > That its highly complex to maintain strict consensus between bitcoin > versions, does not justify consensus rewrite experiments Correct. However, those maintenance costs absolutely do justify working towards formal proofs of correctness for the existing implementation. These plans are no secret and are publicly discussed, but I think it would be instrumental to outsiders if the correctness plans and ongoing progress could be mentioned whenever a warning is made about unjustified and dangerous Bitcoin consensus rewrite attempts. - Bryan http://heybryan.org/ 1 512 203 0507 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150214/67b27d76/attachment.html>