rich1.0npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpghttps://nostr.ae/npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpgnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-08-07 📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:17 PM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > No, I'm not trolling. I really want someone to tell me why we > should/shouldn't reduce the block size. Are we going to have more or less > full nodes if we reduce the block size? Some arguments have floated around that even in the absence of "causing an increase in the number of full nodes", that a reduction of the max block size might be beneficial for other reasons, such as bandwidth saturation benefits. Also less time spent validating transactions because of the fewer transactions. - Bryan http://heybryan.org/ 1 512 203 0507 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150807/564f5483/attachment.html>