rich1.0npub1ldcq03p2qe58u0xnlwa35wchjuhz49y6ueu5ghmtjetez9xstnvsmt8ur6https://nostr.ae/npub1ldcq03p2qe58u0xnlwa35wchjuhz49y6ueu5ghmtjetez9xstnvsmt8ur6njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2016-12-11 📝 Original message:On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:40 PM, t. khan via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Block75 is not exponential scaling. It's true the max theoretical increase > in the first year would be 7x, but the next year would be a max of 2x, and > the next could only increase by 50% and so on. > With those limits there's very little reason to not simply have a fixed schedule. Blocks are likely to all be full in the future anyway, with a real fee market, and the idea that miners will be held back on block sizes for worry about propagation delay is a myth, and even if it were true it would favor collective pooling a lot, which would be a very bad thing. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20161211/ea9bb129/attachment.html>