rich1.0npub1tcwr7j30p5q4sypnsw4arca9s2433s7wdcpt2z2sk7pkqfsntjds0pu5xphttps://nostr.ae/npub1tcwr7j30p5q4sypnsw4arca9s2433s7wdcpt2z2sk7pkqfsntjds0pu5xpnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2023-03-03 🗒️ Summary of this message: Continuous solutions allow for more precise blocking of attackers and low-reputation nodes. Reporting c truthfully is important to maintain reputation. 📝 Original message: The benefit is that you can be more precise when blocking. With a binary solution a single attacker can easily fill your quota of low-confidence HTLCs and then all low-reputation nodes are blocked. But not all of them are attackers, some of them just don't send you enough traffic to get a high reputation for instance and you're going to block them too. With a continuous solution you can differentiate between an active attacker and someone who just sends to nodes with poor connectivity and only block the first. For reporting c truthfully, if you report it too high you will be penalized by having your reputation lowered, if you report it too low you will penalize your HTLCs and still get the same reputation as if you had reported it truthfully. Le ven. 3 mars 2023 à 19:45, Clara Shikhelman <clara.shikhelman at gmail.com> a écrit : > Could you explain the benefits of continuous solutions over binary? This > is something we should definitely understand before going in a more > complicated direction. > > Also, I'm still not sure that the rational behaviour is to report *c* > truthfully. > > > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 11:51 AM Thomas HUET <thomas.huet at acinq.fr> wrote: > >> By giving a high confidence to HTLCs you increase the chance that they >> are relayed which should be your goal. Having a high reputation is not a >> goal in itself, it's just a way to make your HTLCs more likely to be >> relayed. If you always report confidence 0, then yes you will have a >> reputation of 1 but your HTLCs will still be rejected at the first sign of >> congestion. >> >> Le ven. 3 mars 2023 à 17:14, Clara Shikhelman <clara.shikhelman at gmail.com> >> a écrit : >> >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> Thanks for the example. >>> >>> - If c < p then yes it gives it a higher reputation but the reputation >>>> is capped at 1 anyway, so by underestimating the confidence the node >>>> doesn't gain anything. >>>> >>> Is there anything to gain from giving high confidence? By doing this, >>> you risk lowering your reputation, and it's not clear what you gain. >>> Could it be that the best selfish strategy is to report confidence 0 >>> (that maps to reputation 1) all the time? >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20230303/d15bb113/attachment-0001.html>