<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1xg2m84malu0cfm4444r0kysx4rgk27e75aj6sz6538kw8fcz627qeadsv7</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1xg2m84malu0cfm4444r0kysx4rgk27e75aj6sz6538kw8fcz627qeadsv7</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2014-05-16&#xA;📝 Original message:On 05/15/2014 07:48 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:&#xA;&gt; On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Andreas Schildbach&#xA;&gt; &lt;andreas at schildbach.de&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt;&gt; I&#39;m bringing this issue up again. The current Bitcoin DNS seed&#xA;&gt;&gt; infrastructure is unstable. I assume this is because of we&#39;re using a&#xA;&gt;&gt; custom DNS implementation which is not 100% compatible. There have been&#xA;&gt;&gt; bugs in the past, like a case sensitive match for the domain name.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; If software is using the DNS seeds in a way where one or two being&#xA;&gt; unavailable is problematic, then the software may be using them&#xA;&gt; poorly.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; Generally DNS seeds should only be used as fast connectivity hints,&#xA;&gt; primarily for initial connectivity. Relying on them exclusively&#xA;&gt; increases isolation vulnerabilities (e.g. because the dns seed&#xA;&gt; operators or any ISP or network attacker on the path between you and&#xA;&gt; the seeds can replace the results with ones that isolate you on a&#xA;&gt; bogus network).&#xA;&#xA;I just used &#34;nslookup&#34;, after seeing the issues in bitcoinj.&#xA;&#xA;I agree that clients should be robust regarding DNS lookups (and&#xA;bitcoinj isn&#39;t), but still I think the first step needs to be&#xA;maintaining a quality infrastructure.</html></oembed>