rich1.0npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqhttps://nostr.ae/npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqnjumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2015-07-22 📝 Original message:> On Jul 22, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On 7/22/2015 9:52 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> It would be irresponsible and dangerous to the network and thus the users of the software to risk forks, or to take a leading role in pushing dramatic changes. > > Count me among those who see allowing bitcoin to become space-constrained, without technical reason, as a dramatic change. Especially when the reasons cited in support are > > - Various species of vaporware > - Amateurish economic thinking surrounding fees > - "We don't support it because not everyone supports it because we don't support it because ..." infinite descent > I take it you mean allowing bitcoin to *not* become space-constrained - because all real-world computers are space-constrained… > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150722/6e8520af/attachment.sig>