<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgyd</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-12-08&#xA;📝 Original message:Issues that would need to be resolved:&#xA;&#xA;1) Who pays for it? Most obvious answer: Foundation. However there&#39;s&#xA;currently a fairly clear line between the foundation website and the&#xA;bitcoin.org website. I personally am fine with the bitcoin foundation&#xA;funding the website, it&#39;s a lot closer to the bitcoin community than&#xA;github. But some people might care. So next step would be to contact the&#xA;Foundation board and see if they&#39;re willing to fund it.&#xA;&#xA;2) Anti-DoS? I assume github handles this at the moment, though I doubt&#xA;there&#39;s anything to be gained from DoSing the informational website&#xA;&#xA;3) Where does the server go? Ideally, a hosting provider that accepts&#xA;Bitcoin of course!&#xA;&#xA;4) Who admins it?&#xA;&#xA;5) Who controls DNS for it?&#xA;&#xA;Right now I think Sirius still owns DNS for bitcoin.org which is nonsense.&#xA;He needs to pass it on to someone who is actually still involved with the&#xA;project. Again, the most obvious neutral candidate would be the Foundation.&#xA;&#xA;So I think it&#39;s a good idea but there&#39;s a fair amount of work here. The&#xA;primary upside I see is that it opens the potential for adding&#xA;interactive/server-side code in future if we decide that would be useful.&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Gregory Maxwell &lt;gmaxwell at gmail.com&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Drak &lt;drak at zikula.org&gt; wrote:&#xA;&gt; &gt; BGP redirection is a reality and can be exploited without much&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; You&#39;re managing to argue against SSL. Because it actually provides&#xA;&gt; basically protection against an attacker who can actively intercept&#xA;&gt; traffic to the server. Against that threat model SSL is clearly— based&#xA;&gt; on your comments— providing a false sense of security.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; We _do_ have protection that protect against that— the pgp signature,&#xA;&gt; but they are far from a solution since people do not check that.&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; (I&#39;m not suggesting we shouldn&#39;t have it, I&#39;m suggesting you stop&#xA;&gt; arguing SSL provides protection it doesn&#39;t before you manage to change&#xA;&gt; my mind!)&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------&#xA;&gt; Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK&#xA;&gt; Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.&#xA;&gt; Download it for free now!&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&gt; http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&amp;iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk&#xA;&gt; _______________________________________________&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list&#xA;&gt; Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net&#xA;&gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development&#xA;&gt;&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131208/69028098/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>