rich1.0npub1gymmksd9tgwzc5w33umlx08sc2ggys3v2cucmpvl7yy9720wh49s8dvff7https://nostr.ae/npub1gymmksd9tgwzc5w33umlx08sc2ggys3v2cucmpvl7yy9720wh49s8dvff7njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2022-04-22 📝 Original message:On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 09:56, Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I think that trying to find ways to activate non-invasive changes should > be everyone's goal, *even if* they personally may not have an immediate use > case > A change that increases the number of use cases of Bitcoin affects all users and is *not* non-invasive. More use cases means more blockchain usage which increases the price of a transaction for *everyone*. I like the maxim of Peter Todd: any change of Bitcoin must benefit *all* users. This means that every change must have well-defined and transparent benefits. Personally I believe that the only additions to the protocol that would still be acceptable are those that clearly benefit layer 2 solutions such as LN *and* do not carry the dangerous potential of getting abused by freeloaders selling commercial services on top of “free” eternal storage on the blockchain. Zac > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220422/0fd0ef11/attachment.html>