<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1kc0zulxt7j4a0ayhzhrz7jk84y7tm4026qcky7w97hlfkxxap24qnwjfw4</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1kc0zulxt7j4a0ayhzhrz7jk84y7tm4026qcky7w97hlfkxxap24qnwjfw4</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-09-27&#xA;📝 Original message:+1 for deploying BIP65 immediately without further waiting. Agree with &#xA;all Peter&#39;s points.&#xA;&#xA;If BIP65 has to follow the 0.12 schedule, it will take almost 9 months &#xA;from now to complete the softfork. I don&#39;t see any good reason to wait &#xA;for that long. We have too much talk, too little action.&#xA;&#xA;Some mining pools hinted that they may adopt BitcoinXT at the end of &#xA;2015. If we could start deploying BIP65 earlier, they will have a &#xA;patched version by the time they switch. Gavin has agreed to support &#xA;BIP65 in XT.&#xA;&#xA;By the way, is there any chance to backport it to 0.9? In the deployment &#xA;of BIP66 some miners requested a backport to 0.9 and that&#39;s why we have &#xA;0.9.5.</html></oembed>