<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>BTC_P2P (npub1an…fze63)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1an6xs9jt6apmw45rmvu8pnspewdp6juwcgp76fk72ruky4dmcadqwfze63</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>I don’t agree. Just because there was an exploit doesn’t mean the incentives aren’t aligned for companies to provide viable and durable self-custody solutions. &#xA;&#xA;A legal business that has long-term potential profitability is appealing and a positive incentive. Being a hated criminal thief who could lose everything and go to prison for decades isn’t a reasonable goal. &#xA;&#xA;Edge case yes it can happen, but most aren’t willing to risk losing their successful business / position and become a globally most wanted figure.&#xA;&#xA;If this RNG exploit was an inside job to steal bitcoin</html></oembed>