<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>Galois (npub1rc…fct0w)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1rcmnvhhnrylm805ynwcnnte8uq8aen6nu7d2e33gwdrqy7fhzgkqwfct0w</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>nostr:npub1pm5z0gmw3wcvl3yreuv8y7q3stz2zmzc4jar4ckhk927qdcwjwuq3txe07 ok if we take certik risks &#xA;&#xA;« Risks associated with BRC-20 tokens encompass protocol vulnerabilities, centralization issues, network congestion and inefficiencies, and the potential for scams. » &#xA;&#xA;Protocol vulnerabilities : patches with clear docs and rules. As long as rules are open anyone can implement and verify with open source indexers. &#xA;Centralization : like mempools? Like @acinq ? &#xA;Network congestion : does it mean Bitcoin usage is an issue?? &#xA;Potential for scams : as much as any new techs. Nostr relays can scam. LN nodes can scam. Any internet tech can be used to scam. </html></oembed>