<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2013-09-24&#xA;📝 Original message:On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Mike Hearn &lt;mike at plan99.net&gt; wrote:&#xA;&#xA;&gt; BTW, on the &#34;make qrcodes more scannable&#34; front -- is it too late to&#xA;&gt; change BIP 72 so the new param is just &#34;r&#34; instead of &#34;request&#34;? Every byte&#xA;&gt; helps when it comes to qrcodes ...&#xA;&gt;&#xA;&#xA;Not too late, assuming there are no objections. Smaller QR codes is a very&#xA;good reason to change it.&#xA;&#xA;-- &#xA;--&#xA;Gavin Andresen&#xA;-------------- next part --------------&#xA;An HTML attachment was scrubbed...&#xA;URL: &lt;http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130925/d18a015a/attachment.html&gt;</html></oembed>