rich1.0npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2https://nostr.ae/npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2njumphttps://nostr.ae📅 Original date posted:2016-05-11 📝 Original message:On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 03:16:58PM -0700, Simon Liu via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > giving one > > manufacturer/licenser a huge influence in who is successful in a market > > that we're all relying on remaining rather flat. > > Central planning is a slippery slope. Let the market decide the winners > and losers. It's not feasible to hard fork every time an innovation or > perceived unfair advantage appears in the space. That's why we're asking the market right now, and any actual hard-fork to make AsicBoost irrelevant would be voted on by miners themselves and in turn, the economic majority, again letting the market collectively decide. -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160511/2ab40e5b/attachment.sig>