<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><author_name>npub1du3xh5wgds32a5fweqkd9k45kh30wl7kv2kyu8ugz9c2ztdg00tqqvyg93</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.ae/npub1du3xh5wgds32a5fweqkd9k45kh30wl7kv2kyu8ugz9c2ztdg00tqqvyg93</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.ae</provider_url><html>📅 Original date posted:2015-07-31&#xA;📝 Original message:On Thursday 30. July 2015 16.33.16 Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev wrote:&#xA;&gt;  I don’t think it’s really a matter of whether we agree on whether it’s good&#xA;&gt; to raise the block size limit, Gavin. I think it’s a matter of a difference&#xA;&gt; in priorities.&#xA;&#xA;Having different priorities is fine, using your time to block peoples attempts &#xA;to increase block size is not showing different priorities, it shows conflicting &#xA;priorities.&#xA;Different priorities means you can trust someone else to do things they care &#xA;about while you do things you care about.&#xA;-- &#xA;Thomas Zander</html></oembed>