Nostr'a Katılın
2026-07-20 18:32:27 UTC
in reply to

silverpill on Nostr: >in your proposal everybody needs to convince one or more gateways (who have HTTPS / ...

>in your proposal everybody needs to convince one or more gateways (who have HTTPS / ICANN domains) to host for them.

Relays can be onion services, eepsites, etc.

I think they don't even need to talk HTTP, although this HTTP servers are the most well-understood.

>If I'm not mistaken, you cannot just tag @[email protected] and have that work, unless you've seen some message from them before which provides their gateways...

You can (example: ), but normally webfinger address belongs to the primary gateway.

>Actually on second thought, I suppose names cannot be @[email protected] because there's no way to verify someone isn't lying about owning instance.tld,

Gateways are advertised via actor object, which servers can't tamper with. Verification of a handle is done by checking:

- Actor.gateways contains hostname
- acct:username@hostname resolves to Actor

>so names need to be key-like, like names in Nostr (?)

The canonical identifier of is

ap://did:key:z6MkumzpDj1cYZD2GrBbVT86xL6CfPuyqWZAEXMfSqN9j3hf/actors/019c4320-5a91-59c3-0092-16976328fd80