馃搮 Original date posted:2015-06-14
馃摑 Original message:I definitely think we need some voting system for metaconsensus鈥ut if we鈥檙e going to seriously consider this we should look at the problem much more generally. Using false choices doesn鈥檛 really help, though ;)
- Eric Lombrozo
> On Jun 13, 2015, at 10:13 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo at gmail.com <mailto:elombrozo at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 2) BIP100 has direct economic consequences鈥nd particularly for miners. It lends itself to much greater corruptibility.
>
>
> What is the alternative? Have a Chief Scientist or Technical Advisory Board choose what is a proper fee, what is a proper level of decentralization, a proper growth factor?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150613/9edf8eb0/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150613/9edf8eb0/attachment.sig>;
