Chris Liss on Nostr: Agree with the first part, but why would he be “compromised?” Just seems like ...

Agree with the first part, but why would he be “compromised?” Just seems like that’s something the legacy media has repeated endlessly from Russiagate to the Epstein Files without basis. I mean I’m sure he’s looking out for his backers like all politicians but the “compromised” thing just seems facile to me.