Bro, we now have AI that allows you to verify these claims within seconds. The fact that you posted this without taking the time to check any of the claims is just embarrassing and shows you are not interested in the truth.
You can put this into your own AI, but here are some Highlights:
“Virgin birth” (Horus, Krishna, Buddha): Misleading or incorrect.
Horus: Egyptian myths describe Isis reconstituting or conceiving Horus connected to Osiris’s body; that is not the same as the Christian doctrine of a human virgin conceiving by divine intervention. The precise Egyptian accounts and interpretations vary and do not match “virgin birth” in the Christian sense.
Krishna: born to Devaki and Vasudeva (human parents). No orthodox Hindu source describes a Christian-style virgin birth.
Buddha: some texts portray Queen Māyā’s birth story with miraculous elements, but it is not a virgin birth analogous to the Christian claim.
Jesus: the virgin-birth claim is found in Matthew and Luke in the New Testament — this is a distinct claim and has different theological meaning.
“Crucified / died and resurrected after three days”: Incorrect for most.
Jesus: historic crucifixion and the Easter resurrection claim are central to Christianity.
Osiris (Egyptian) is killed and later restored/incarnated in various ways in the myth cycle, but this is not a straightforward “crucifixion on a cross and resurrection after 3 days” parallel to the Gospel accounts.
Krishna: Hindu accounts record his death (for example, being pierced by an arrow); there is no canonical crucifixion–resurrection-after-3-days narrative.
Buddha: most traditions hold that he died (parinirvana) — there is no resurrection-after-3-days story comparable to Christian resurrection.
