All three of you are lying because none of you are actually doing any work towards that goal.
It is not Impossible to use Monero wrong, you can use Monero in Custodial services for scale, cheap transactions, safe custody and other reasons, so it is not impossible to have the ratio of Monero siphoned out of the anonymity set approach the ratio of BTC to private RBTC on Rootstock if someone builds that...
You all are asserting a nonsensical notion that you can have privacy without caveats, and that Monero is that promised land... That is bullshit, the economy will always have private and auditable moneys and the absolute best you can wish for is:
1. Large enough anonymity set.
2. Option to anonymize your coins when necessary
3. Bonus; merchants accept the private money directly without forcing you to exit the private pools
But #3 is not that important.
Moreover, almost ANY scalability solutions ends up adding to privacy because by definition you can't have perfect data availability at scale, so things like privacy pools, or private Rollups, or eCash mints with insurance smart contracts or just a proof of stake sidechains that only shares data between anonymous validators, or Intmax2 and other client side validated solutions... It all makes auditability and trackability much harder.
All I see here is people too lazy to build things on Bitcoin sidechains, but also are not satisfied with Monero to shut up! Like what are we doing here? Is this therapy? Write some code and bootstrap the thing the hard way like we all have to.
