Thank you. It's just that I remain unclear on this:
> We also know that m₁ and m₂ are really close to each other, while m₃ is further away. So
>
> m₁ < m₃ < m₂
>
> is ruled out, as @UweHalfHand noted.
>
> But none of this says whether m₃ is bigger or smaller than the other two masses.
It's just that I don't see how m₃ could be known to be "further away" when it's not even known whether it's above or below m₁ and m₂.
Usually a situation like that would mean that the unknown value could be anything in that entire range.
Strider Uwe 🇺🇦🇨🇦🇲🇽 (npub1zkt…gyj7)
