One might look at this and think that your position is that nothing has been learned in 30 years that could allow us to improve healthcare.
I'm not arguing to be a blind follower but if you are blindly rejecting every change you are as dumb as people who are blindly following.
Something that improves your odds of an adverse outcome from 5% to 1% seems small framed that way but 1 in 20 becoming 1 in 100 is the same change and looks very different.
Each of these measures of your health should be considered on a personal level in the context of all of your other health markers. Only then do you decide personally if or how to do something different.
