But at the end of the day, not really:
"Tinfoil itself acknowledges it hasn't yet achieved fully reproducible builds, meaning there remains a gap between "attested recipe/measurement" and "independently reproducible binary" not unlike Venice's issue #4, just mitigated by an external, harder-to-tamper log"
I would say unless you can verify binary, you are taking their word for it. Encrypting tool calls is big usability win though.
And also model selection is not very good on Tinfoil/PPQ (not even the newer Qwen3.6 models). GLM-5.2 is the only one.
