Why is thinking and debating in tradeoffs without personal attacks so hard? Ego and fear.
I support BIP110 because it makes logical sense to me as a path forward. It’s not perfect by any means. But defaulting to doing nothing is not an option here, because the barrier to run a node just becomes too big without change.
I also recognise I’m not able to be aware of the implications of every scenario so still open to change my mind.
There are risks in every direction, assessing it with clarity is what is needed.
npub18e…8tdkj
2026-02-26 09:07:16 CET
Author Public Key
npub18ehqwddc5t5klr8kv0my6p9mnn4fxxhuc4l4gf7rtwmgt854ez3qv8tdkjPublished at
2026-02-26 09:07:16 CETEvent JSON
{
"id": "cb71b062d725b4f8fa7ae87014bbe619b1f8491228f1b60977c0cdbd6afd1d4d",
"pubkey": "3e6e0735b8a2e96f8cf663f64d04bb9cea931afcc57f5427c35bb6859e95c8a2",
"created_at": 1772093236,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Why is thinking and debating in tradeoffs without personal attacks so hard? Ego and fear.\n\nI support BIP110 because it makes logical sense to me as a path forward. It’s not perfect by any means. But defaulting to doing nothing is not an option here, because the barrier to run a node just becomes too big without change.\n\nI also recognise I’m not able to be aware of the implications of every scenario so still open to change my mind.\n\nThere are risks in every direction, assessing it with clarity is what is needed.",
"sig": "08f44d1034bacee249a2ff1d3bc3c60c33d6883ca9d901ddb1f848861000ad6ba045a2976bd10672fe703700c6b17af2feab9f3c636831da5cd82284c34be2ab"
}