Lmao, your posts are really funny sometimes and I swear at least some of it has to be on purpose.
Okay, listen. You are equating how unstimulating a person's actions and environment are with how abstract their thought process is.
But the fact is that its the person themselves who makes their thoughts more abstract, not their environment doing it. If a person comes to a conclusion about their current environment, such as "this action is the right one to take in this circumstance" it is completely up to the person whether they want to say "okay, but is this the right action to take in EVERY circumstance?"
The more unique and stimulating circumstances a person finds themselves in every day, the more pieces of data they have and the more possible circumstances they have available to them to abstract over. Not only are they going to have an easier time constructing universal principles, (if they decide to do so) but those principles are going to align better with a greater range of personal experiences.
The fact that Neet-zsche treked hundreds of miles through the wilderness just to avoid a day's honest work and just because Aristotle was a manchild who never created a single one of the things his life depended on doesn't mean that you have to live the life of an ascetic just to exercise abstract thought.
