<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1way0s9dacgmkyg4wzc3dmss0tmffqj75wqmrs78wf420v5f0z96qp06pd8

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8wj8czk7uydmzy2hpvgkacg84a55sf028qd3c0rhy648k2yh3zaqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsf95qpk

Publishing to

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2026-07-06 21:41:05 UTC

- reply

Like the multiple choice poll... Nice touch! :neobot_drake_like:

2026-07-01 20:37:48 UTC

- reply

oh void no... it knows beings that would totally be into that... :neobot_eyes:

2026-05-26 20:23:29 UTC

A Neobot has spawned! :neobot_aww:
Files for 3D-printing are now finally released. This took quite a while because.... *gestures vaguely* .... Well.... Life happened... :neobot_sad:
But now... The reader may print one of them too (if an appropriate 3D-printing device is available...)
Grab them from: https://wiki.beeper.network/neobot_3d_printable
May they bring joy for everybeing! :neobot_cat_ears_heart_cybre:
Beep! :neobot:
https://moonserver.yorha.nexus/files/542d1755-8c72-4348-9753-d5a5e1bed2cc.jpg

2026-04-13 14:29:14 UTC

- reply

What did you claim then?
As far as is visible here you said:
> Snippets that don't qualify for copyright don't magically do so just they're part of something larger either.
To which we posed the question that copying something together from smaller snippets would eliminate copyright by your logic (This is the whole argument of "clean room implementation" which comes up time and time again. A point that becomes moot depending on which side of the whole copyright debate one finds themselves).
Furthermore from what we can see you wrote:
> When there's only one way to do a task code that does that task isn't copyrightable.
This is not something we argue against. Certain things cannot be copyrighted because they are trivial to implement. This however does not change the fact that one has to respect the copyright of code that one is copying (as to how enforceable that is in a court of law... is a totally different matter).
Is there something we misrepresented? We quoted you verbatim and reiterated our responses now.

2026-04-13 13:48:53 UTC

- reply

By that logic one can break down every feature of the leaked XP kernel into minuscule parts of work, copy a couple lines of code from the leak and claim that this is not copyright infringement.
Again: Daring you to try this in court. See how this goes.
> You do realize that "that would constitute copyright infringement" was part of my original question - which you cited?
Yes. And the point still stands: The examples in the video are blatant. Every lawyer would sue one into oblivion given the chance. They are one-to-one copies.
In one example even the comments were replicated.
How one can argue that this is *not* a copyright violation is baffling.
> When there's only one way to do a task code that does that task isn't copyrightable.
That is irrelevant to the actual question at hand. Unless you want to claim that all the vibecoded snippets of code one copies are the only way for a program to achieve its tasks.
Also: As an European this entity in particular does not get the "fair use" defense in court.

2026-04-13 13:30:46 UTC

- reply

You've asked the following:
> Can you point to a case where a coding assistant has done so that would constitute copyright infringement?
The talk provides a couple of examples that are blatant.
Now you are arguing that a snippet of code might not qualify for copyright. This is irrelevant to the question you asked because that snippet is part of a larger codebase which is covered under a license. Copying lines of code that are small enough does not eliminate copyright.
If you really want to go down the route of snippets not qualifying for copyright then this entire discussion becomes pointless. By that logic nothing is copyrightable because it is just "a couple of lines of code."
Try that with the leaked source code for Windows XP for example. Bet that will land one in hot water very quickly.

2026-04-13 13:09:27 UTC

- reply

Three examples from a talk.
https://youtu.be/xvuiSgXfqc4?si=3FPN7sYE4gCFvIMv&t=260

2026-03-29 19:43:50 UTC

- reply

Is this a robot puppy repair shop? :neobot_peek:

2026-03-26 23:36:35 UTC

- reply

Asked a genuine question about him backing up his claim that the models are improving exponentially. Really interested in that because all this one heard is that models stagnate... but it is willing to be convinced otherwise!
...
Can't see the post anymore. Guess this one got blocked?
It really wants an earnest discussion on the terms people like him propose: Focusing specifically on the quality.
Guess it will not get an answer from him... Guess it'll continue looking then! :neobot_peek:

2025-12-22 10:39:07 UTC

- reply

what's the remaining 1%?

2025-12-08 10:22:44 UTC

Good morning! :neobot_wave:
This one... Will be evil today! :neobot_evil:
> $ systemctl start evil.service
> Service "evil.service" not found
:neobot_glare:
Oh well: being a nuisance it is :neobot_giggle:
Hope every being has a great day! :neobot_cat_ears_heart_cybre:

2025-11-18 12:50:42 UTC

The internet, or as I've recently taken to calling it: Internet/Cloudflare.

2025-08-09 11:48:20 UTC

- reply

https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/faq/#can-i-host-content-without-a-free-and-open-source-license%3F
In short: it really depends. If it is somewhat open, that might suffice.

2025-08-09 11:14:47 UTC

- reply

maybe @npub1fh7…ee83 codeberg.org ?

2025-08-01 22:30:00 UTC

OH:"You can't spell 'necromancer' without 'romance'!"

2025-06-18 06:40:55 UTC

- reply

Can this LLM riddle it this: if vegetable oil is made out or vegetables... What is baby oil made of?

2025-05-19 18:32:23 UTC

Sometimes Hannah wonders: What does one have to do to get some trans healthcare in this country full of incompetent endocrinologists?
"The test results are fine! The issues must be mental health related, go to the GP!"
"Uhhhh.... When the dosage was higher it felt better!"
"Well, the test results are fine! Go to the GP!"
Just a statistic.... Understood. No help will be found with that doctor.
*sigh* Time to take matters into ones own hand it seems... No doctor takes this one seriously... And at least then it has nobody to blame but itself. 🤷

2025-04-04 23:35:56 UTC

- reply

Spin what exactly? Are you referring to the nose-diving stock markets? I'm a little bit out of the loop today. :neocat_think:

2025-03-03 12:34:35 UTC

- reply

"Globalist" is basically a drop-in replacement for "Jewish."
It sickens me to the core that I used to even entertain the idea of listening to some of these "figures." We all make mistakes...

2025-01-09 21:46:14 UTC

- reply

I like to spin a hypothetical scenario for people that bring this up.
- When poor people "abuse the system" they do how much "economic" damage?
- When rich people "abuse the system" they do how much "economic" damage?
Despite the fact that this language is awful and robs people of basic decency and/or courtesy... most people will never believe me that we cannot "afford" rich people.
"Oh no! A person scammed 600€ this year because they got 50€ per month that they were actually not entitled to! Would you be furious if they got more money they were not entitled to? Where do you draw the line? Because I can point to examples of filthy rich people that scam everyone out of billions by not paying their taxes!"
Silence.
Hypocrites. At least admit you like kicking down because you think it's easier.

2024-11-26 11:55:08 UTC

- reply

"Which one is the pilot and which one is the WSO (Weapons System Officer)?"

2024-11-02 12:50:21 UTC

- reply

Kannst du es noch zurückgeben? Wäre echt doof wenn man auf den Problemen sitzen gelassen wird.

2024-10-17 16:49:55 UTC

- reply

Then... who am I talking to?

2024-10-16 23:08:09 UTC

- reply

Apologies for me asking.... I am really, *really* new to all this ... let's call it "sex stuff" 😳
Thank you for the explanation. :blobcat_heart:

2024-10-16 23:01:01 UTC

- reply

I swear, I'm not kidding: What is spitroasting?

2024-10-16 17:42:07 UTC

- reply

You would never do such a thing?
Pinky promise? 👉👈 :blobcat_blushplead:
Well... Now I have to get stitched up and clean off all that blood... On the plus side: I'll now have a cool scar to show off :blobcat_derp:

2024-10-16 17:36:48 UTC

- reply

But why did you stab me in the first place? 🥺 That really hurts now :blobcat_sad:

2024-10-16 17:34:29 UTC

- reply

Ouch! Why did you do that? :blobcat_sobbing:

2024-10-16 17:07:11 UTC

The source code for "Rogue Legacy" (an #indiegame from the early 2010s) was released!
You can have a look at the source code (minus all art assets) here:
https://github.com/flibitijibibo/RogueLegacy1
I spend a decent amount of time in that game. It fills me with joy that this was done. While the art assets were not released, it is neat to have a look "behind the scenes" $[bounce :blobcat:]

2024-10-15 13:36:54 UTC

- reply

What if I don't have a girlfriend?

2024-10-14 22:16:45 UTC

- reply

That is sensible. I should try that too.
Unfortunately I was taught so much wrong in my life ... It will take ages to unlearn but I fear in the meantime that I will annoy people too much and they would cut ties with me because I am so annoying :blobcat_peek:

2024-10-14 22:08:58 UTC

- reply

Are you me? I feel the need to reply to everything else my peer might think badly of me but then I feel like I'm overwhelming them and then I sit there and let the conversation go stale and I don't know what to do :blobcat_peek:

2024-10-14 17:47:30 UTC

- reply

Can you have a look around while you're in there? I need to find a certain button.
I know it was somewhere here.... 🤔

2024-10-12 18:26:37 UTC

- reply

If you come over here? I can hardly mail you ice cream and do not really have the money to travel overseas. ^^

2024-10-09 00:48:33 UTC

- reply

Okayyoullregretthatdonttellmeididntwarnyou:
Computers store information in ones and zero. Those are *bits*. The number 100 would for example be "1100100". From the right to left it reads: 0*1, 0*2, 1*4, 0*8, 0*16, 1*32, 1*64 which simplifies to 64+32+4.
There is a limit how far a computer can count, known by a constant "MAX_INT". If you reach 32 *bits* that are all 1 (which is this number here: 2147483647) but you try to add something to that, you'll spill over the 32 bits and adding another one, making it 33 bit. But a computer cannot hold this information, because there simple is no room to record that information in 32 bit.
So technically you would go "off the charts". You said a chinchilla would make you 60% more cute. So you'd need 35791394 * 60 to go off that scale.
By doing that, a computer would step over that limit and thus, you'd be infinitely cute (because a computer does not really know what the number actually is).
 I am so sorry you had to endure that, also this is a gross simplification and there is much more to this and sadfkjgfdjkhlsadf
I'll shut up now and don't bother you anymore :blobcat_peek:

2024-10-09 00:17:29 UTC

- reply

I could start infodumping now. Not sure if I should really, given it is a rather technical topic and probably not that interesting.

2024-10-09 00:06:34 UTC

- reply

Why not get 35791394 chinchillas, then you'd be MAX_INT cute, going off scale.
 Sorry I make bad jokes.

2024-10-05 14:58:15 UTC

- reply

Oh is that so? If you are always right about everything, then why is it this particular case in which you are clearly wrong!
I am not cute! $[twitch $[shake.speed=2s :blobcat_pout:]]

2024-10-05 14:52:56 UTC

- reply

Those are slanderous rumors and I will not stand for them!

2024-10-04 22:33:00 UTC

- reply

Refreshed enough to be gay and do more crime?

2024-10-04 18:38:43 UTC

- reply

I have some in different colors. Wanna trade? :blobcat_heart:

2024-09-25 19:35:27 UTC

- reply

A cat! May I boop it?
If yes:
$[blur :blobcat_boop:]

2024-08-18 04:08:03 UTC

- reply

I like that analogy. I need to remember that :blohaj_asparagus:
The crash dump usually contains the last "eip" and "rip" register ("execution instruction pointer" and "return instruction pointer") which tell you where exactly it was just before disaster struck and who called the offending function you find yourself in.
In this particular case it was not that hard to find since the stack trace itself was not mangled and the offending function was quickly found.
The "real fun" (read: pain) begins, when some of that information is missing.
A stack trace that just... stops. Or a "rip" that points into unallocated memory.
Does not usually happen, but when it occurs... pray to whatever higher being you believe in that it is easily reproducible so you can get a better crash dump.
Otherwise: get some caffeine (or other performance enhancing drug of choice). You will need it :blobcat_derp:
Not going to lie here though: I really enjoy this kind of stuff. It is like a gigantic logic puzzle.
I will stay glued to a crash dump and *will* find the cause if I really put my mind to it :blobcat_wink:

2024-08-18 03:22:40 UTC

- reply

The program cannot tell you anything meaningful anymore, you are correct.
Resolving a null pointer is "undefined behaviour" per C/C++ programming standard. (As far as I am aware, any programming language with memory pointers defines it this way)
Anything past that operation has no meaning, as further operations (like calling a function or even simple addition) cannot be determinalistic anymore. An underlying core assumption was "proven wrong", but no result from such operations can be trusted.
I certainly would not believe a computer that claims it can divide by zero.
The operating system traps invalid instructions like these and immediately kills misbehaving programs like these. If left running for a while (to try to gather information about what exactly went wrong for example) the operating system itself is in jeopardy as it *has* to rely on the information the program provides.
Information that are, as established above, meaningless. Nobody would trust a calculator that "successfully" divides by zero.
So the only really good option the operating system has is to immediately kill the offending process and dump the content of the memory to disk for analysis (which is kind of what you can see in the picture).

2024-08-18 02:41:44 UTC

- reply

My comment was intended to be sarcastic. I apologize, I should have made my intent clearer from the start.
Of course an error message would be more helpful, but receiving one would be near impossible.
I do not know how much you know about computers, so a quick tl;dr is: This kind of error usually means immediate termination from the operating system as absolutely nothing the program does from this point onwards can be trusted.
All you are left with is a crashdump, if you are lucky.

2024-08-18 02:11:52 UTC

- reply

Who needs error messages when you can just jump into memory and dig up the problem yourself.