<unnamed>

I don’t think people who hate governments are retarded.
I just think people who hate governments without having ever lived somewhere not run by a government are retarded.

2025-12-29 03:02:24 CET

- reply

South Sudan is currently run by separatists right?

2025-12-29 02:56:07 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/c6e56bf31e261bee12533ccd319049fe33f9e7db944c5346545e5bff93994629.jpg

2025-12-28 21:04:58 CET

- reply

Well energy frequency and vibration in the hippie, spiritual sense is a bunch of nonsense

2025-12-28 21:03:47 CET

- reply

Why put yourself through it?

2025-12-27 10:32:54 CET

- reply

Not as easily compromised as a border patrolled by volunteers

2025-12-24 04:26:52 CET

- reply

So with the currency collapsing, the politicians corrupt, the Fed unable to control inflation, you’ll be leaving the USA for good asap right? Or will you actually be using all the benefits of living there (property rights, book distribution platforms, centralised exchanges, police…) and just pretending you want to exit the system so you can keep selling anger justification to actually unhappy people?

2025-12-22 03:04:01 CET

- reply

Eh. Why do you need to justify existence? That’s a human-created concept

2025-12-14 11:26:04 CET

- reply

How? De pegging usd from gold resulted in the longest pp boom for average Americans in history and it is still the reserve currency 50 years later

2025-12-14 10:45:51 CET

- reply

My main point is that you’re a moron that has to continually tell everyone that usd collapse would be good for americans, that american institutions hate their people, inflation is 8% despite every source saying that isn’t possible or his entire worldview collapses. And you have to support charlatans like Lyn who give you convincing alternatives while cashing in on your hope (in fiat)

2025-12-14 10:23:13 CET

- reply

It’s a survey of publicly available prices. If you don’t wanna believe it that’s fine but not based on evidence, just conspiracy theory. You’re saying that the fed is somehow the enemy of the people since it can’t control inflation, so people should buy an asset that has fallen 30% in a few months… to avoid losing purchasing power that has lost less than 1% in that time due in a large part to powell keeping rates above cpi….

2025-12-14 10:13:33 CET

- reply

And also lets not forget that in September your ‘macroeconomist’ said bitcoin would be flat at 120k

2025-12-14 10:12:04 CET

- reply

And if you can’t keep up with 2% yearly inflation maybe don’t buy an asset that can fall 30% in a few months

2025-12-14 09:59:04 CET

- reply

That’s not what the votes show. Powell has been the most hawkish president since Volker

2025-12-14 09:24:01 CET

- reply

It would be… ? Not sure how that excuses attacking the guy still showing up at 70 cautioning about lowering rates while the president calls him a loser, despite how much that boosts your book sales

2025-12-14 05:54:59 CET

- reply

Not american, but at what point does your celebration of the usd failing become unamerican?

2025-12-13 11:22:46 CET

- reply

What a sellout. How can you write a book about how bitcoin fixes the financial system, not your keys not your coins, blah blah, and then endorse paper bitcoin products a year later.

2025-12-13 10:51:00 CET

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/e89d77567c3da590fb454980f23337df3b097874a729dcf83e3c3166203854c4.jpg

2025-12-13 09:35:59 CET

Even smaug the dragon couldn’t self custody

2025-12-13 06:04:23 CET

- reply

As imperfect as an undefined train metaphor?

2025-12-11 05:32:27 CET

- reply

I believe the term is White Elephant

2025-12-11 05:29:34 CET

- reply

Total or debt/gdp?

2025-12-11 02:35:37 CET

- reply

So what is the train? Asset prices? Inflation? Liquidity? Government debt?

2025-12-04 07:24:02 CET

- reply

Americans be like

2025-11-18 03:44:28 CET

- reply

Gee I wonder why, even a 5 year old child could understand what you just said

2025-11-18 03:42:07 CET

- reply

Thanks genius

2025-11-18 03:41:22 CET

- reply

I wish she didn’t capitalise random words

2025-11-15 03:01:02 CET

- reply

It could easily be solved *except for the solution would make the majority of people poorer…

2025-11-15 02:59:30 CET

- reply

You realise inequality if we only had bitcoin would be thousands of times worse right? 94% of humans would literally have no money

2025-11-15 02:43:27 CET

- reply

5 should come after 6, when 6 shows 5’s design can actually be printed

2025-11-13 09:21:05 CET

- reply

Short for Mayanaise? :p:p

2025-11-13 07:54:14 CET

- reply

Enabling drug dealers has always been bitcoins primary use case

2025-11-13 06:55:50 CET

- reply

‘You’re 100% right about this and I accept full responsibility.’

2025-11-10 03:01:04 CET

- reply

That’s true but long term hodlers also age out of their bodies, or lose their keys. So the percentage of longterm holders that are both interested and able to sell could be going up despite the percentage amount of sats moved falling.

2025-11-10 02:25:18 CET

- reply

Fair point, it can’t. But it can make any movement of sats reportable, and require all held bitcoin to be kyc’d, and impose criminal penalties for non compliance, as it has done. Bitcoin can exist but can’t be used legally. See China for example.

2025-11-09 10:06:46 CET

- reply

That’s just using words to try to argue against a reality that is what you’re saying can’t happen. If US regulators can control access, preference, stamp coins, coerce miners and exchanges it is a cbdc in all but name. And if they go really far, they can effectively issue more coins through a hard fork or potential control of pools/ hash power. The onus would be on the forked/ outhashed minority to establish their version of bitcoin as the real one, when the exchanges, miners, pools, treasuries and regulators are all against them. This wouldn’t be an easy fight and you could argue it would be an unwinnable one.

2025-11-09 09:59:36 CET

- reply

Every mode of transport can fly if you put enough explosives under it

2025-11-08 23:30:17 CET

- reply

That’s a good writeup. Which way do you think you lean? And then if you say overanalysis, what tribes would you be okay with offloading a bit of your cognitive load to sometimes?

2025-11-07 10:24:34 CET

Thought nobody wanted to hear of the evening: bitcoin isn’t about money. It’s about mortal people tying their identities so closely to something that might last a very long time and feeling a little bit less mortal.

2025-10-25 11:15:43 CEST

- reply

The sycophant clickbait has arrived

2025-10-24 04:23:20 CEST

- reply

I can’t see the US allowing that

2025-10-23 05:33:59 CEST

- reply

You can keep saying that but it won’t make it true

2025-10-23 05:32:07 CEST

- reply

Bitcoin isn’t money. It’s a collectible that virtually no one accepts.

2025-10-23 04:32:53 CEST

- reply

That’s true. Also the fact that it could take hundreds of years for the USD to go to zero because they have a monopoly on violence so if you don’t pay tax in USD you go to jail or get sanctioned/bombed/ put outside the US defence umbrella. Bitcoin is still around because policymakers know it isn’t a threat

2025-10-23 04:30:10 CEST

- reply

Not really. Deficits can be funded by debt issuance basically indefinitely when you are the world reserve currency

2025-10-19 10:12:30 CEST

- reply

Your grandma: ‘stop eating raw meat you moron’

2025-10-19 10:09:34 CEST

- reply

They went from holding 0.0023% of their gdp as reserves in gold to 0.029%. Still a tiny fraction of their usd reserves

2025-10-18 08:49:46 CEST

- reply

All the legitimate criticisms she could have made about it and she says this twaddle

2025-10-18 08:42:53 CEST

- reply

Religion is just a group of people that promise they won’t tell each other to face reality.

2025-10-16 09:04:04 CEST

- reply

I still think american salesmanship is the more accurate label

2025-10-15 04:17:57 CEST

- reply

Something about giving this dude money because it will make me free. American marketing 101: claim there is a problem and then promise that giving america your money is the solution. Russia and China use the same tactics routinely

2025-10-15 02:05:47 CEST

- reply

Dude complaining about your life being too digital and then shilling bitcoin in the same presentation is retarded

2025-10-14 05:54:15 CEST

Crypto
https://blossom.primal.net/0af702f6fe33a270682e2c7b467b686786239a511c676f93cbca7f504e848723.jpg

2025-10-14 03:03:51 CEST

- reply

If you are lamenting your life moving online, maybe don’t move your money online too…

2025-10-14 03:02:55 CEST

- reply

The obvious point being that the world especially the Western world doesn’t need more versions of money, especially digital money. It needs to get better at keeping real rates positive.
#nevent1q…9k2v

2025-10-12 04:19:57 CEST

- reply

Look at my previous reply

2025-10-10 00:58:46 CEST

- reply

Selling while not KYC’d is dangerous too, is my point.

2025-10-10 00:57:32 CEST

- reply

You might be right, but you might also be projecting what you think a family should look like onto them. They might see the shared silence as great

2025-10-09 07:15:34 CEST

- reply

Governments of one kind or another are permanently forbidden in basically every third world country right at this moment.

2025-10-09 07:13:27 CEST

- reply

The right will sell more phones

2025-10-09 07:11:20 CEST

- reply

Well the someone travelling clause is you, if you’re out, so that means you can be using it constantly.

2025-10-09 07:09:33 CEST

- reply

I can already accept cash with zero fees

2025-10-09 06:30:14 CEST

- reply

The future of finance indeed

2025-10-07 04:31:32 CEST

- reply

@hal view on Putin?

2025-10-07 04:28:51 CEST

- reply

I don’t really care why you posted, or why you zap. You said that a currency that circulates more is better (I agree) and I pointed out that if that is your hope then a currency with a finite supply is not likely to achieve that goal.

2025-10-07 03:46:41 CEST

- reply

I’m not doubting that we will, or that you might continue to do so via zaps. I’m just doubting whether most people will choose to exchange a medium today if its likely it will be worth more tomorrow

2025-10-07 01:31:21 CEST

- reply

‘No ads. No gatekeepers. No backdoors.’ I’ve heard that before

2025-10-07 01:29:06 CEST

- reply

You’re saying that selling is easy but that it involves committing a crime

2025-10-07 01:28:28 CEST

- reply

But if the value was inflationary why would you spend it?

2025-10-06 08:43:54 CEST

- reply

‘Its all energy, and the more freely it flows the more there is.’ Isn’t this the entire reason people say you need an inflationary currency and why bitcoin won’t work?

2025-10-06 08:42:24 CEST

- reply

Can you see the failure of your argument yet or do you need me to say it

2025-10-06 01:09:17 CEST

- reply

If you ask this on Nostr what replies do you expect

2025-09-30 11:29:35 CEST

- reply

I keep reading his name as Taliban

2025-09-29 03:58:03 CEST

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/e1298ffa35675d45c1d582a0e98334f55a7bd3440b0d90dda0b9513cf09aa7b5.jpg

2025-09-29 03:35:54 CEST

- reply

And if you aren’t?

2025-09-28 05:40:59 CEST

- reply

It doesn’t make a difference

2025-09-27 10:24:05 CEST

- reply

Even if it was, why would it matter? 99% of stuff on the internet is not useful to humanity and even the authors didn’t ever intend it to be

2025-09-27 06:21:23 CEST

- reply

It would be a taxable event

2025-09-25 11:36:00 CEST

- reply

Your ai is even more stupid than you are.
First, there is no fundamental rule that gold must be valued at a certain USD price based on how much USD is in circulation. If there was gold would always reflect money in circulation, which it doesn’t.
Second, gold has not become more valuable. It is still a yellow pet rock.
Gold has risen because real yields have fallen, causing people to speculate (italics) on non yield bearing assets. Go and defend silver too if you like, it has risen too.
This unwinds as soon as real yields rise, not when ‘gold reprices higher’. So this is the definition of a bubble.
But feel free to keep wasting the earth’s energy producing garbage outputs like this, at least it will prevent you buying more crayons to chew on.

2025-09-25 02:23:49 CEST

- reply

Ok. Clueless it is

2025-09-25 01:23:09 CEST

- reply

Maybe. Have you given any thought to how a country would continue to run without taxation other than ‘bitcoin and booze’? If so I’m happy to upgrade you from clueless to hypocrite.

2025-09-25 00:44:21 CEST

- reply

The fact that basically every country would prefer imperfect printed paper tells you all you need to know about their unwillingness to value everything against your pet rock.
Stop wasting your crayons.

2025-09-25 00:16:23 CEST

- reply

True but I think gold bugs often use the lack of reserve gold as a bullish driver

2025-09-24 12:56:15 CEST

- reply

At least with tulips you could just chuck them in the bin
#nevent1q…m9sj

2025-09-24 12:20:42 CEST

- reply

Ask that to someone who cashed out gold down 65% nominal in 1999 after believing people like you in 1980, when inflation had been high and the dollar had been falling right up to the peak

2025-09-24 11:00:03 CEST

- reply

As opposed to it always having been common everywhere else

2025-09-24 10:57:52 CEST

- reply

Funny how these chicken shits never say free speech has died in the places all the migrants are coming from.

2025-09-24 10:51:25 CEST

- reply

Gold has been flat or falling in even nominal terms for more years than it has been rising in the last 100 years alone while your two ‘sound financial logic’ conditions existed.

2025-09-24 10:46:24 CEST

- reply

Did the printing stop when gold was flat for 35 years or when it was falling for 20 years in the last century alone?

2025-09-24 10:37:11 CEST

- reply

Do you really think the etfs that are driving the gold price have the gold either?

2025-09-24 07:52:56 CEST

- reply

Your arguments are as bad as your grammar

2025-08-20 11:08:29 CEST

- reply

This person looks dishonest

2025-07-22 10:22:46 CEST

- reply

I don’t think you have an argument