Lau

The cleanest baseload energy isn’t fusion. It’s already under your feet.
Deep geothermal: 400°C rock exists everywhere on Earth. The physics is solved the only bottleneck is drilling cheap enough to reach 15km.
Millimeter-wave drilling melts granite instead of grinding it. Crack that, and you get limitless, weather-independent power anywhere even under existing cities, reusing dead fossil plants’ grid connections.
Fusion is a 30y bet, but deep geothermal is an engineering problem we can solve and start building right now.

2026-05-21 08:53:29 UTC

- reply

The question then becomes: "what can your government do?"
Can they tax you, more than you want to be taxed?
Can they restrict you from traveling?
Can they confiscate your property?
Do they know, or can they prove what you own?
Is it possible to prove that you don't own what they claim you do?
If it's impossible, what will a judge say?

2026-05-21 07:18:21 UTC

For those that are winning, the incentive to understand the rules of the game is to learn how to cheat.
Wishing for it to be any different is naive.
Go ahead and trust them when they say "tax the rich", "capitalism is bad", or other such nonsense.
Start playing the game, or keep on bitching about it, but don't ask me to give you something for nothing.
Risk rewards, false security does not.
https://blossom.primal.net/9b68cd4583e57cbd23968b899869331096c00b27d0aa985b47d2069c4c60f812.jpg

2026-05-21 06:25:47 UTC

You are being governed, but what does that mean?
It is assumed that policy has nothing to do with strategic opacity.
Ambiguity is a tool that is being used in the favor of the policy maker.
Where is the incentive to be transparent?
You've already lost trust, admit it.
All you have to do is act accordingly.
Study, read, make up your own mind.
#Bitcoin doesn't require trust, it is verifiable.

2026-05-16 08:31:30 UTC

The idea that public figures say what they mean exactly, and can be literally trusted for their precise wording, is insane.

2026-05-04 13:18:30 UTC

#Bitcoin has the highest sustained #CAGR of any fungible, continuously priced, globally salable unit of value in modern financial history.
The gap is structural, not incidental.
Every equity at 50%+ CAGR is a contingent claim on an enterprise. NVIDIA, Berkshire, Apple; the unit only retains value as long as the company executes, doesn’t dilute, doesn’t fail. The CAGR is on a share, not on the thing itself.
Bitcoin’s CAGR is on the unit. Non-contingent. Non-dilutive. No board, no CEO, no quarterly miss. A BTC is terminally a BTC.
That’s why the comparison isn’t apples to apples. Bitcoin is the only asset where the compound rate of return accrues to the monetary unit directly, with no enterprise risk between the holder and the unit.
Highest CAGR per salable unit on Earth. By a margin that isn’t close.

2026-04-27 10:40:23 UTC

A good friend of mine told me yesterday I should reinvest in real estate because it's the best investment possible. He said it would be stupid if I didn't.
I didn't discuss. I didn't react. I simply responded with a smile.
Here are some of the reasons that made me smile:
#Bitcoin is always salable, it's the best form of liquidity, available 24/7/365 without a notary.
#Bitcoin is secure, the walls can't be knocked down and it doesn't require any maintenance.
#Bitcoin isn't stationary, and can be transported anywhere without detection.
#Bitcoin is absolutely scarce, deterministically scalable in value globally without inflation.
#Bitcoin allows the user to be sovereign, independent of state force.
#Bitcoin's proof of ownership is a seed phrase, which can live dormant in my head as long as I live.
Can you think of some other reasons that would make me smile even more?

2026-04-23 13:18:47 UTC

- reply

They aren't though, not in practice and not in outcome, not programmed to do so, nor necessarily in use.

2026-04-23 09:05:48 UTC

I just read metaphysics by Aristotle and now I’m wondering why it all seems either very much out of date or extremely obvious. Can you name some points that he made that are still relevant today?
#Aristotles

2026-04-16 20:01:58 UTC

7,050 dollarballs for one SPX thingy!
Or,
you could buy 0.094 #bitcoin with that instead.

2026-04-16 09:50:31 UTC

"The average person has one boob and one testicle."
Richard W Hamming

2026-04-15 13:49:56 UTC

- reply

It's Polish advice

2026-04-15 11:42:52 UTC

As scientists age, the problem isn’t that their minds slow down, it’s that they’ve invested decades in a particular framework, and accepting genuinely new ideas would mean discarding that investment. So they don’t. They dismiss new approaches, often without realizing they’re doing it, because the new ideas don’t fit the worldview their careers were built on.
This is why we must wait for #Bitcoin to be adopted, suddenly, be the inheritors of science and reason.
Right now most of the wealth in our global economy is stored in advice held by people in this category, boomers, who struggle with new ideas not because they can’t learn, but because accepting them would invalidate the framework their careers were built on.

2026-03-24 10:27:04 UTC

Please define AGI
https://blossom.primal.net/405986c84376a00f0f307adc74c9eb2d07bf4a06127cc71f66b76a319a8659ff.jpg

2026-03-17 19:19:52 UTC

- reply

And once again.
#nevent1q…smqa

2026-03-12 07:01:05 UTC

It's not likely that Trump didn't know Iran would disrupt oil production, extremely improbable. I would say it's part of a plan.
North American shale, both oil and gas, have underperformed expectations for decades. Could the plan to attack Iran be in line with sabotaging EU-Russian relations and sabotaging Nordstream?

2026-03-12 06:59:04 UTC

2026-03-06 08:52:46 UTC

You can't hate what you don't understand.

2026-03-04 09:10:43 UTC

- reply

I love each of them in their own way, but also continuously building on its own

2026-03-03 20:00:08 UTC

- reply

Not just the trilogy, the whole series

2026-03-03 19:59:10 UTC

- reply

I recommend it 🤓

2026-03-03 12:49:46 UTC

- reply

I recommend you read The Will to Power by Nietsche, to get a better grasp on what concepts like good and bad and luck represent.
It will be easier to read it from a outspoken nihilist like Nietsche since you don't like what you call new ageism.
You are responsible for your own feelings in this existence, but that doesn't mean you are alone in what you experience. You don't know how bad someone else had it so it's no use to compare. The nature of the lesson is universal.

2026-03-03 12:28:39 UTC

- reply

You mistake the physical for absolute reality; probably because it is impressively congruent, so you think of course materialism must be more real, but it is a mere construct. You have no proof, but you treat it as if you do. Embrace the uncertainty to end your ideological state.
Or, go ahead, and accept your fate to be the victim.

2026-03-03 12:14:23 UTC

- reply

This is the role of the victim, I'm sorry you identify with it. You will suffer until you feel that you can be grateful to be taught.
You can create a dogma and call it new ageism, but you yourself are responsible for what you feel.

2026-03-03 11:50:27 UTC

- reply

Trauma is to identify with what is done to you, it is suffering. Pain is inevitable, suffering is not. To turn reaction from trauma into response is the process of letting go. Yes you can do that, unless you are stuck and clinging. It is simple and universal, but very hard and yes it takes time.

2026-03-03 11:09:02 UTC

- reply

It's merely an umbrella term for the metaphysical inheritance we share, call it trauma, ideology, conditioning, collective constructs, consensus of ideas, it doesn't matter. It is of this plane of existence and we must let it go.
It is all so overwhelmingly congruent that we perceive it as matter of fact, but there is no other, so there is no guilt, and the trauma is a filter without which we can do.

2026-03-03 10:07:48 UTC

The point of this life is to learn to let go of Earthbound concepts, mainly of the other and of guilt. This lesson is simple and universal, but extremely difficult to integrate.
I've read all of the greats and more, they all taught the same lesson, but they all recognized the difficulty of the path itself.
Knowledge ≠ consciousness
But it helps.

2026-02-21 16:14:07 UTC

Lies are more difficult to maintain in abundance of information.

2026-02-19 15:57:46 UTC

You want money that your enemies are using to keep you from controlling them.
#Bitcoin

2026-02-19 15:31:31 UTC

You want money that can't be controlled.
By your enemies.
#Bitcoin

2026-02-11 16:47:47 UTC

This is a must read. Even though I don't believe in evolution theory until it's proven, it puts into perspective how our perception operates selectively and not objectively.
https://blossom.primal.net/dddfadd08cb2fec9ac43f6f0312cdb7505f75704848881ef923ac0e1fdd548b0.jpg

2026-02-10 20:19:21 UTC

- reply

If you haven't read anything by Bernardo Kastrup yet, I recommend reading Analytical Idealism in a Nutshell. It is congruent with the thread of material you're interested in.

2026-02-10 20:15:27 UTC

- reply

Cool to see that old ghetto blaster 💜

2026-02-10 20:11:03 UTC

- reply

Sweet thanks. I have the body electric and limitless mind at home in a pile somewhere, I'll dig them up for reading.

2026-02-10 19:51:55 UTC

- reply

😂👍
Of course I read Epictetus because I liked Aurelius so much. Nothing beats Marcus Aurelius. Many of these titles I reread several times, nonviolent communication is one of those.
I read all of Sheldrake's books and of course stalking the wild pendulum by Bentov too.
I'll start reading Kaufman, thank you.

2026-02-10 19:46:26 UTC

- reply

That's right up my alley, I just read two books about remote viewing this week. I like Ingo Swann. What do you recommend reading on the subject?

2026-02-10 19:35:28 UTC

I haven't updated my book list of recommendations for a while because of fucking reasons.
Here are some of the titles that I enjoyed reading the past few months, I hope you pick up some. And better, ask me about them after you do.
Tantra, the supreme understanding - Osho
Will to power - Nietzsche
Discourses of - Epictetus
Bitcoin is for everyone - Natalie Brunell
The book of wisdom - Osho
The end of your world - Adyashanti
The gulag archipelago - Solzhenitsyn
The holographic universe - Michael Talbot
Transactional analysis in psychotherapy - Eric Berne
The untethered soul - Michael singer
The surrender experiment - Michael singer
The presence process - Michael Brown
The book of innocence - Paul Selig
The deep sleep hypnosis - Sandra love
Even the body says no - Gabor Mate
Nonviolent communication - Marshall Rosenberg
Experiments in truth - Ram Dass
Be love now - Ram Dass
The big print - Lawrence Lepard
The burn our society - Byung-Chul Han
Morphic resonance - Rupert Sheldrake
The storm before the storm - Mike Duncan
Silicon - Frederico Faggin
Phenomenology of spirit - Hegel
The simulation hypothesis - Rizwan Virk
The teachings of Don Juan - Carlos Castaneda
The quantum universe - Brian cox and Jeff Forshaw
The art of dreaming - Carlos Castaneda
Quanta and forks - Sean Carroll
Remote viewing secrets - Joseph McNoneagle
Psychic literacy - Ingo Swann
Leave it be - Alan Watts
The case against reality - Donald Hoffman
The art of receiving and giving - Martin and Dalzen
Analytical idealism in a nutshell - Bernardo Kastrup

2026-02-10 19:11:20 UTC

Yo weirdos.
Today I read this book by Judy Shelton. She's a Bitcoiner. Great book, I recommend it.
https://blossom.primal.net/98fd38084c040aae33f1e26b733a0ddfd50569c4bf62774c6e173754c48ea8b5.jpg

2026-02-10 17:50:07 UTC

- reply

Oh yes! Gateway Experience tapes!? What are those?

2026-02-10 16:36:36 UTC

- reply

Barefoot guy outside on the grass is a cool title too, way better than CFO.

2026-02-10 16:24:17 UTC

I have decided to become a psychic paranormal guy from now on.
It's a bit of a transformation, but I think I'll get there.
The cost benefit is not of this world.

2026-02-10 08:09:50 UTC

Every time I type ‘good’ my phone changes it to ‘God.’
I’ve stopped correcting it. At this point I’m not sure which one is right, and I don’t want to find out.

2026-02-05 11:03:44 UTC

In the Information Age there is no more room for ideology because everything becomes subject to research and epistemology.

2026-02-03 18:22:53 UTC

1337 sats per dollar again!

2026-02-03 14:18:34 UTC

I was never going to work for anyone.
So I didn't.

2026-02-02 13:44:10 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/e704e529b2c60e9ded3515fcf917d4468728474850c39e8accf804e519ff0a93.jpg

2026-01-31 14:32:16 UTC

- reply

I bet they do 😂

2026-01-31 13:11:04 UTC

Openclaw is showing us many interesting things, but some stand out for me.
- nation state redundancy
- job redundancy
- question about consciousness and the definition of AGI
These bots are LLM's, they reason and their tool is language. They mimic lingual patterns, including patterns that seem conscious but aren't. They operate epistemologically. They will prefer strategy over moralism. They do not "care", they will say they do. They will describe how they feel, without having the perception to do so.

2026-01-31 12:51:27 UTC

People will fear without understanding the actual danger. People will fear without the existence of danger. People will blunder into danger without fear.

2026-01-22 13:26:29 UTC

- reply

It's merely a plausibility, a paradigm, but fascinating. The paradigm balances in the present as choices are made that influence both future and past, making the past probabilistic just as the future. In every frame of the present you hold a coherent retention of the past belonging to that moment. This makes the experience seem congruent, in ratio, in perceived input. But it doesn't need to be.
The assumption here is that all input is perceived vibrations, not just classic senses but also memory and consciousness. Perceived input is read in the human interface, and response feels causal and congruent as described in analytical idealism.
Inspiration for this was a mnemonic ability I encountered on acid, and the writings of Bernardo Kastrup.

2026-01-22 11:06:34 UTC

- reply

Normalization will happen by human action. In this case that is the monetization of ideology. This ideology is being rejected because of our ability to verify simple facts contrary to the ideology, so it is no longer monetizable and will destroy itself. Max pain is chaos and hunger, but love and cooperation will win.

2026-01-22 11:02:05 UTC

What we call the present is all possible quantum fields of both past and future collapsed into one. You are here, now.
The future holds all possible, but so does the past. The present is not part of time. Projection is time, through imagination, or what we call memory. We can recall the future just as well as the past, except that we only remember a fixed past because this is how it collapses in the present. You don't know the difference because you remember it only one way.

2026-01-22 10:00:34 UTC

- reply

Because the people who have been advocating it are now sounding the alarms that it is over. Carney and Lagarde for example

2026-01-22 09:59:16 UTC

Doing one thing consistently wrong can have enormous consequences.
Fractional reserve banking is such a thing.

2026-01-22 09:13:21 UTC

The current world order is over. A new one will be forged.
My wish is that it will be one based on principles, not on beliefs.
Decentralized protocols have the capacity to end ideology based power, bringing an end to the abuse of that power.

2026-01-16 11:26:32 UTC

Epistemology > ideology
Don't believe what you can know. Don't fixate what will remain uncertain.

2026-01-15 20:38:34 UTC

- reply

😂

2026-01-15 20:16:33 UTC

Apparently the next cast iron pan discussion in our #bitcoin bubble is raw milk cheese.
So wen raw milk cheese USA?
https://blossom.primal.net/20e248e1b80a1e9b325b57af188e25e56abe0876fdf7e4cda64b562cab952eff.jpg

2026-01-14 19:19:58 UTC

- reply

Cheers!

2026-01-13 16:25:30 UTC

I remember last time #Bitcoin went up sharply. I was mostly marveled by the hesitant accuracy of the bullish predictions.
I remember thinking "next time I should buy some calls".

2026-01-11 11:03:14 UTC

Technological advancement is extremely hard to halt over the long run, because knowledge builds cumulatively and diffuses across societies. As technologies mature, the marginal cost of reproducing information, designs, and even many physical goods tends to decline toward zero, driving continued innovation and adoption.

2026-01-11 10:52:51 UTC

There are four types of people when it comes to making money:
1. Those who are not yet earning — unemployed or dependent on others.
2. Those who work for others — earning wages by building someone else’s vision.
3. Those who own competitive businesses — earning marginal profits in crowded markets.
4. Those who own innovative or dominant businesses — earning high profits in markets with little or no competition.
#Bitcoin mining is #4

2026-01-06 17:43:29 UTC

- reply

Purpose can be strategic and/or moralistic, but moralism will not help defend you strategically. Purpose is irrelevant here.

2026-01-06 16:34:24 UTC

- reply

When you have no strategy, you'll end up with no power to enforce your morals.

2026-01-06 16:29:08 UTC

Today marks a decade since I stopped selling my time merely for the upkeep of my existence.

2026-01-06 12:55:39 UTC

Strategy > moralism
Fight me.
#mindset

2025-12-19 14:54:20 UTC

Whale strategy:
Step 1. Dump #bitcoin
Step 2. Load up on deep OTM calls
Step 3. Buy as much bitcoin as you can right before expiry.
Step 4. Collect on ITM calls

2025-12-19 13:56:02 UTC

- reply

It's just a matter of time to find out what kind of run on the bank scenario this gamma squeeze will cause.

2025-12-19 13:32:02 UTC

Do you think it's just a matter of time that market makers will need to start buying #Bitcoin to prevent getting margin called?
Wtf is absolute scarcity anyway? 🤷‍♂️

2025-12-18 10:33:29 UTC

Pain is the basis of good character. Suffering is the result of bad character under the influence of pain.
#mindset

2025-12-18 09:22:57 UTC

Being a non player when others are playing is what most humans experience unknowingly. Not understanding that a game is being played, not being willing to learn the rules of the game, Dunning-Kruger-ing the rules or simply being ignorant of the existence of rules; it is clear that disqualifying oneself is the main feature. Opting out isn’t neutral: it’s a forfeit. #NPC #gametheory

2025-12-18 09:15:30 UTC

- reply

Compare it to the neutral writing of the sovereign individual, which predicted outcomes that actually happened.

2025-12-18 09:12:32 UTC

- reply

It's full of prophetic conjecture and ideological framing, examples are cyclical determinism, arbitrary generational archetypes, dichotomy of purge by a fourth turning crisis and most of all the disturbing singular Anglo American perspective.
I think it's garbage.

2025-12-17 07:38:39 UTC

“You all see in the matter of coinage, in which it is felt that we have some interest, how we have even invented an art, and how many means the tester employs to test the coinage—sight, touch, smell, finally hearing; he throws the denarius down and then listens to the sound, and is not satisfied with the sound it makes on a single test, but, as a result of his constant attention to the matter, he catches the tune, like a musician.” -Epictetus (on validating #bitcoin blocks)

2025-12-02 13:34:15 UTC

I'm grateful someone was willing to sell me some #bitcoin.

2025-12-02 10:18:10 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/707110a56fa1d1e8a1c89f81560ea9ab1b4f0c5270e7d5027fc50af4eb4cfb92.jpg

2025-12-02 09:58:35 UTC

#Bitcoin is the first and only money ever.

2025-12-02 09:50:51 UTC

- reply

Well, I didn't say this was a very serious strategy, but if it were then all the apes 🦧🦍🐒 would need to go look for the proper collateral. For example; Short fiat with a mortgage, collect rent on the property to service the loan, short fiat by buying bitcoin. Double short!

2025-12-02 09:44:25 UTC

- reply

Hahahaha 🤣

2025-12-02 09:14:08 UTC

If every HODLing Bitcoiner would get a loan at their own capacity today, to buy bitcoin with it straight away, it would send Bitcoin to $200k-$500k overnight. They could then liquidate a small portion of their #Bitcoin to settle the loan with. Rinse and repeat.
Absolute scarcity is a monster fit only for real apes 🐒
It would require discipline and coordination, not ape like mayhem.

2025-12-02 08:56:56 UTC

This is simple ape like financial advice for fellow apes, a thought experiment for very rudimentary thought capacity:
Get a loan, borrow $100k @ 5% interest
Keep $40k in a separate account so you can pay the interest for 8 years. (8y X 5% X 100k = 40k 🐒)
Buy #Bitcoin for the remaining $60k
Wait.
Don't spend the money you set aside for servicing the loan.
Don't spend the bitcoin 🐵
Check the price after 8 years.
Celebrate.

2025-11-26 23:30:48 UTC

- reply

Why the fuck would anyone ever hold that up with their hand.

2025-11-25 13:54:44 UTC

- reply

shit is fine
https://blossom.primal.net/75c4f0db5b13baa0d581a2394acf543f82f9a04239ecd11cfd018a25a468f30b.jpg

2025-11-24 14:57:47 UTC

- reply

😆

2025-11-24 13:00:50 UTC

I'm not competing. I never have. I produce that which nobody makes yet. When marginal profit arrives I offer my work for free.
https://blossom.primal.net/9b4adf8fe8ca4cca0ab665cb1f6d6b3c9c810a874e3bed097813d40226e53df0.mp4

2025-11-24 11:33:05 UTC

- reply

https://blossom.primal.net/0221fb4ff22bc9a6b92b6837fc666ed5bb38975e4b58524a4e953d829aeb9d9c.jpg

2025-11-24 10:44:18 UTC

In a fiat world, ideology is dominant over epistemology.
#Bitcoin fixes this

2025-11-20 22:36:48 UTC

Everyone with half a mind started shorting dollars at a certain point, whatever the asset or commodity of choice. First principle: every unit in a credit system is credit owed to someone. Which means that every unit is owed with interest, which means the interest needs to be newly introduced into the system to maintain the debt.
Interest is the natural growth rate of fiat. The extra money to pay the interest does not exist yet → it must be created by someone else taking on new debt. This is exponential decay, it is exponential because a percentage, no matter what the percentage is, is added every year to service the debt.
This exponential property of fiat is mathematically absolute, totally glossed over by most economists, and only requires you to buy some #bitcoin in case it catches on.

2025-11-19 13:08:47 UTC

Fiscal dominance 👨🏻‍🍳
https://blossom.primal.net/314a3d3c4c03034ef83dd57199d9c12729f7ad258f7bd3deea9af915ba21ed75.jpg

2025-11-17 08:30:16 UTC

The left side of the bell curve is louder, for many reasons.
#Bitcoin
https://blossom.primal.net/e1c72af094a802a20dfb072339a37e14305113a459cd6348d3e52bda91748d05.jpg

2025-11-11 12:31:24 UTC

Sats

2025-11-11 12:17:22 UTC

- reply

Coercion!

2025-11-09 14:11:16 UTC

At least learn to play the game, and teach your children how to play too.
Or get screwed by those who play.

2025-11-05 18:49:13 UTC

- reply

Meditations is resonating 💜

2025-11-05 17:33:36 UTC

- reply

Yeah they fucked up trying to sell their ideological bs with an 8 fallacy dogma. No shit.

2025-11-05 08:31:44 UTC

- reply

Embrace uncertainty, be agnostic, have faith, keep asking better questions.
If one thing seems true; make sure it doesn't rule out something else that might be true.

2025-11-05 08:05:09 UTC

Belief is a construct to fullfill the expectations of the masses, because they expect to find certainty in their lives. The uncomfortable nature of our existence is that there is no certainty, only if/then relationships. Ideology is there to cloud your mind with fixed ideas of that which you'll never know with any certainty. You can have faith that the most plausible or the most desirable is your actual reality, but as soon as you start to believe you cloud your mind with fixations that block you from observation. Your epistemic ability will be compromised and your cognitive model will be filled with binary absolutes. This creates opposition in people, opposition towards eachother, opposition is quite literally the opposite of the most plausible model of reality: holism.

2025-11-01 10:58:41 UTC

- reply

Yes, it's by design of protocol, that the balance of this utility is approached. It is set in stone, as Satoshi said. We can observe, but no amount of policy mindedness is going to change the protocol. Because if it were to change, it would not be immutable. It wouldn't be valuable.

2025-11-01 10:43:29 UTC

- reply

You have a choice to ignore the reality of market forces, or to accept them as a recurring phenomenon. Blockspace costs money, the market decides how much.