<unnamed>

Public Key

npub1thmlda0knxxtg4p7s8must4hccr8fclufwdraahz3fgw36p4mcksz470mj

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs9malk7hmfnr952slgra7g96muvpn5u07yhx377m3g558gaq6autgprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hszrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqfv4y8l

Publishing to

relay.snort.social

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2023-06-07 17:21:49 CEST

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2014-05-20
📝 Original message:Unlikely. I doubt any significant portion of miners in china will continue to mine on a china-specific chain, since it will certainly be outmined by non-Chinese miners, and will be orphaned eventually.
More likely is that mining interests in china will make special arrangements to circumvent the GFwOC.
Users who can't access the worldwide blockchain will notice horrendously slow confirmation times and other side effects.
> On May 20, 2014, at 10:37, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org>
>
> Could a blockchain fork due to network split happen?
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1593 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140520/b680ca83/attachment.p7s>