<unnamed>

Public Key

npub16wxlvxa5c25gcawkfcf7v6w8ray5scwm8t8y0qkxpfr3h5c5j0aqhws45h

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsd8r0krw6v92yvwhtyuylxd8r37j2gv8dn4nj8strq53cm6v2f87spz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dset7tf0

Publishing to

nostr.wine

relay.damus.io

nos.lol

Last Notes

2023-06-07 15:15:40 UTC

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2014-03-14
📝 Original message:I think
* if we change to mBTC because your state currencys price for bitcoin
make this a valid option we will change again in future
* users do not like changes
* we should keep a good standard
A good standard should be
* built on standards (e.g. SI)
* backed by best practice: never force the user to take an option he
cannot change
* do not make changes without users permission
* take care of users at fault when entering 5.967 ot should be pointed
out before sending that e.g.
the sw understood 5967.000 000 00 BTC
instead of 5.967 000 00 BTC
because the user failed to use the correct delimiter.
For now a good standard is
* simply bitcoin as BTC with eight decimal places
or could be
* uBTC as SI prefix, probably using XBT as a symbol for compatibility
with other software
* satoshis (w. SI prefixes if numbers are to big) for regions where
decimal places in prices are uncommon
So I'd prefer:
Make the choice transparent to users and set a standard that the user
alway should be empowered to use all available decimal places.
And there should be a set of official test-cases for wallet software and
the desired behavior.

2023-06-07 15:14:26 UTC

- reply

📅 Original date posted:2014-03-27
📝 Original message:Companies can have a Cert with their name via CAcert. It requires some work though to get assured as an organisation.
Did you already think about what CA is to be trusted or do users need to do that. The least good decision in my POV would be to accept OS/browser built in CAs only.
Am 27.03.2014 um 11:08 schrieb Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net>:
>> But these cases are the norm, rather than the exception.
>
> Well, you're lucky, you live in Berlin. Most of the payments I make with Bitcoin are online, to websites. So this will differ between people.
>
> I wonder how critical it is. Let's say you are paying for a meal. In your head the place you're at is just "the little Indian restaurant on the corner". In the companies register and therefore certificate it's something like "Singh Food GmbH". That's probably good enough to prevent shenanigans. Even if there's a virus on your phone, it can't really replace the cert with a random stolen one, otherwise your meal could show up like "IronCore Steel Inc" or something that's obviously bogus. It'd have to be an incredibly smart virus that knew how to substitute one name for a different one, from a large library of stolen identities, such that the swap seemed plausible. That sounds very hard, certainly too hard to bother with for stealing restaurant fees.
>
> And if a waiter at the restaurant is corrupt and they replace the cert with one that's for their own 1-man business "BP-Gupta" or something, OK, you might pay the wrong person by mistake. But eventually the corrupt waiter will be discovered and then someone will have proof of what they did. It's FAR more likely they'd just strip the signature entirely and try to convince you the restaurant doesn't use BIP70 at all.
>
> Still, if we want to fix this, one approach I was thinking about is to have a super-cheesy CA just for us that issues certs with addresses in them, for any name you ask for. That is, if you say you want a cert for "Shamrock Irish Pub, Wollishofen, Zurich, CH" then it either sends a postcard to that address with a code to check ownership of the address, or it checks ownership of the place on Google Maps (which does the same postcard trick but for free!).
>
> That doesn't work for vending machines, but perhaps we just don't care about those. If a MITM steals your lunch money, boo hoo.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140327/5d27c649/attachment.html>