<unnamed>

Public Key

npub163xk0q9nla0rq8drkl4vw56n70gwur60ckdmmkmd4h2hrrdllfnqveqjec

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsdgnt8szel7h3srk3m06k82dfl858wpa8utxaamdk6m4t33kll5esprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0d4hhxarj9ecxjmnt22ap92

Publishing to

relay.momostr.pink

Last Notes

2026-08-05 07:16:34 CEST

- reply

As a screaming AI skeptic I find the screaming AI proponents to be more tiring.
But I absolutely agree on the gauntlet part.

2026-01-06 17:33:44 CET

- reply

@npub1k79…tp5x do you know someone in Bavaria, Germany who's willing to take on and digitize a bunch of CDs and Vinyls from the State's public broadcaster?

2024-11-23 23:46:35 CET

- reply

Maybe I'm too pessimist here.
But when did the tech industry (or any other one) not react with either bare minimum or malicious compliance when faced with government regulations?
I feel like it's always the same playbook and I don't see why that time would be different.

2024-11-23 23:38:31 CET

- reply

Yes, thats what I'm saying.
And Data-harvesting companies would respond to mandatory notifications once a year in the same malicious way.

2024-11-23 21:57:01 CET

- reply

I feel like this could heavily backfire. Similar to the weponoized cookie-banners.
But a great middle ground would be a law that forces companies to inform people about it as soon as they get data about them the first time.
All the "Partner Companies" of data collectors would hate this, because until now most people aren't aware of them.